The distance between any two objects is changing over time due to the expansion of the universe. When we look at a distant object, we are effectively looking back through time, since the speed of light is finite and takes a time to reach us. For example, when we look at the Sun, we see it as it was 8 minutes ago. When we look at the Andromeda galaxy, the light has taken about 2.2 million years to get to our galaxy, so we see the Andromeda galaxy as it was 2.2 million years ago. This relationship between time and distance is called Cosmic Scale Factor.

To compare distances and sizes from different times is not easy since we must remove the effects of expansion. In this article, we are going to assume a flat geometry to the universe.

Consider left hand image in the graphic above. This represents an arbitrary point in time in the past (t_{1}). We can see a galaxy at point (0,0) and another one at point (3,2). These points are **comoving coordinates**. Simple trigonometry tells us that the distance between the two comoving coordinates is 3.6 units (a^{2} = b^{2} + c^{2}).

Now consider the image to the right. This represents another point in time, let's say it's the present (t_{0}). The galaxies are still at the same coordinates, and the distance is still 3.6 units, but we can clearly see that they are separated by a larger distance. We can also see that the longer intervals have also expanded with time.

There are two possible definitions of a comoving coordinates, and both are used in cosmology. Unfortunately, the same symbol *r* is often used for both. Comoving distance coordinates are used as follows.

- The
**comoving radial**distance coordinate for calculating proper distances between objects at two different epochs (i.e. large time separation). - The
**comoving angular**diameter distance coordinate for calculating proper distances between two objects at the same epoch.

The coordinates are exactly that - coordinates. They are not distances, but proper distance may be calculated from them. Think of comoving coordinates as labels attached to the galaxies for all time. Different galaxies have different comoving coordinates, but a particular galaxy keeps the same comoving coordinates forever. Using comoving coordinates, we are able to describe the position of any object independently of expansion.

We can define the proper distance x(t), corresponding to different times, in terms of the comoving radial distance coordinate r using the equation:

Equation 35 - Proper Distance

The notation R(t) indicates that the cosmic scale factor is a function of time and its value changes with time (epoch).

In an expanding universe, the scale factor R(t) corresponding to a past epoch is smaller than 1, and greater than 1 for future epochs. A scale factor of 1 represents the current epoch (now)

- R(t) < 1 in past
- R(t) = 1 now
- R(t) > 1 in future

The behaviour of the cosmic scale factor R(t) with time tells how the universe itself evolves with time. Knowing this we can construct a relationship between redshift and the scale factor for another epoch.

Equation 36 - Redshift and Scale Factor

This shows that the redshift can be used to specify the size of the universe relative to the size today. Astronomers and cosmologists talk about redshifts of objects rather than distances or emission epochs.

## Worked example of Cosmic Scale Factor

A distant galaxy has been analysed and it was found that it has a redshift of z = 2. What was the size of the universe at the time when the light left the galaxy relative to the size of the universe now?

Equation 37 - Scale factor worked

Thus the linear size of the universe was one-third of what it is now.

## The Hubble Constant

The Hubble Constant (H_{0}) gives a value for the expansion rate of the universe. This expansion rate is equal to the rate of the change of the scale factor.

The rate of change in scale factor it is given the symbol

The dot above the R is the mathematical notation for "rate of change". Using the comoving radial distance coordinate, r, we can derive the expansion "velocity" v:

which is Hubble's law with

So the Hubble "constant" is actually time-dependent, and its value can be determined by the measurement of redshifts and distances to galaxies.

Most of the comments regarding the big bang are all in the singular.

To believe that 13.7 Billion years ago there was no cosmos, no anything and suddenly the cosmos began as a big bang is to say the least ludicrous. The indications are that time has been going for more years than we care to imagine and that billions upon billions of big bangs have occurred throughout time and space, and are still occurring . With this in mind there would be expanding universes everywhere but everywhere is a very large space and the nearest to ours would probably be so far away in time and space that we would have no inkling of it. Never the less these expanding universes would eventually interact making any accurate measurement of expansion rate impossible. A point against the singular big bang is that if the space time bubble has been expanding for 13.7 billion years then the light from the extreme fringe would require another 13.7 billion years to return to our area of space where it could be measured, a total of 27.4 billion years,so confirmation of the singular big bang can not be made for another 13.7 billion years.

MoK